Versatility of the buccal fat pad flap

[su_button url=”” target=”blank” style=”flat” background=”#bd1221″ size=”5″]Download PDF[/su_button]



F. Biglioli

Full Professor and Head of the Specialization School for Maxillofacial Surgery, Milan University, Milan, Italy
Head of Maxillofacial Surgical Unit, San Paolo and San Carlo Hospitals, Milan, Italy



The buccal fat pad (BFP) flap is an important reconstructive option in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Its abundant vascularization, coming largely from the depth of the pterigomaxillary region, allows to transpose it with high reliability to fill posterior and lateral defects of the upper jaw. The aim of this work is therefore to describe this surgical technique.

Technique description

The popularity and diffusion of sinus lifting involves frequent tearing of the sinus membrane (7% to 35% of cases). Defects larger than 10 mm can easily be repaired by transposing the adaptable adipose tissue of the BFP, while allowing to contemporarily graft bone plus hydroxyapatite. Oro-antral communications can also be reliably solved using a BFP flap, which may eventually be utilized as a vascular support for an overlying mucosal flap. Finally, maxillary and palatal gap smaller than 2.5 cm of diameter and consequent to oncological surgical removal may also be repaired by this easy technique.


The success of the BFP flap lies in its ease of harvesting, eventually under local anesthesia, the immediate proximity to the loss of substance to be repaired and its very low morbidity.

Adipose tissue, Buccal fat pad, Oral surgery.

DOI: 10.32033/ijdm.2017.2.04.5


The buccal fat pad (or Bichat’s fat pad) is a versatile and reliable source of adipose tissue near the maxillary tuberosity. Its rich blood supply makes it extremely reliable for use in the form of a pedicled flap, assuring a good healing capacity and defence against infections. Its considerable volume allows the blocking of large losses of substance, while its distinctive composition means that areas of irregular shape or otherwise difficult to suture can be easily sealed with less adaptable tissues such as the periosteum and the attached gingiva.
The most frequent uses in oral and maxillofacial surgery are in sealing extensive sinus membrane perforations resulting from sinus lift operations, repairing oroantral fistulas and repairing minor substance losses in tumour surgery. A further use is for covering maxillary bone grafts.
Its success is certainly due to the ease of its preparation even under local anaesthesia, its vascular reliability, the absence of evident scars and the very low donor-site morbidity.


Bichat’s fat pad (Figure 1) is named after the French anatomist, pathologist and histologist Marie François Xavier Bichat who described it in 1801, but is more commonly known as the buccal fat pad (BFP). Its function is to facilitate a gliding movement between the various muscles, bones, tendons and blood vessels-nerves buried deep in the face and oral cavity.

Figure 1 View of the BFP

The BFP consists of a main body, located deep in the buccinator muscle and in front of the masseter muscle, and 4 extensions: the buccal/inferior, masseteric/superficial, pterygoid/posterior, temporal/deep and cranial. The pad is held in position by fibrous septa that, partly weakening with age, can result in downward ptosis.
The abundant blood supply derives from the deep buccal and temporal branches of the internal maxillary artery, the transverse facial artery, a branch of the superficial temporal artery and several branches of the facial artery including the inferior buccal artery.

Some of the central-face branches of the facial nerve run in close relationship with the upper margin of the body and masseteric process of the BFP, providing motor innervation to the orbicularis oris muscle, the caninus muscle and the transverse part of the nasalis and, further back, the zygomaticus muscles.

The parotid duct can come into contact with the masseteric lobe of the pad, while its superior part is much higher in the vestibular sulcus than the incisions usually made when harvesting a BFP flap.

Surgical technique

Once an incision has been made in the posterior vestibular sulcus, the periosteum is detached from the bone surface of the tuberosity and the lower portion of the zygomatic pillar. The body of the BFP is immediately revealed beneath the vestibular periosteum after it has been incised and lacerated by opening the ends of a pair of scissors or Klemmer pliers (Figure 2). At this point, the adipose tissue spontaneously emerges from its natural seat with its typical tendency to fill the spaces.

Figure 2 View of preparing the BFP flap: the dissection by spreading the tips of scissors exposes the body of the BFP which immediately expands towards the oral cavity

The masseteric and buccal extensions are cut to allow the pad to go towards the receiving site. Given the rich vascularization of the adipose tissue, it is essential to coagulate with bipolar forceps before cutting the tissues in order to prevent the fat from retracting, thus making it difficult to find the bleeding vessels.
The flap prepared in this way is assured a blood supply by vessels coming from the pterygoid and temporal lobes.
The isolated tissue is particularly fragile. Preparing the flap and its forward traction to cover the bone defect or soft tissues must be done gently to avoid tearing the adipose tissue and thus not be able to completely cover the donor site. For the forward traction of the flap after its separation from the masseteric and buccal processes, it is delicately moved with vascular pincers to find the fibrous bands still retaining it. These are coagulated and cut in order to be able to position the fat very gently and cover the defect. The displaced tissue is usually abundant and will spontaneously cover large defects, up to about 2.5 cm in diameter. Personally, I attach the flap with resorbable sutures of multifilament 2-0 or 3-0, calibres sufficient to reduce the possibility of tearing the delicate adipose tissue. The removal of sutures remaining on view must be done no earlier than 20 days after surgery to provide the maximum guarantee against a recurrence of the fistula.
In the case of oroantral fistula (Figure 3-11), if a large loss of bone accompanies the defect in the soft tissues, a double lining closure could be employed, using the adipose mass as a base for a mucosal flap to position on the surface. To allow the mucosal flap to easily slide towards the palatine mucosa to obtain a tensionless suture, the vestibular periosteum that holds it in place must first be cut, being careful to perform an accurate haemostasis.


Figure 3 Case 1: oroantral fistula (arrow) and maxillary sinusitis resulting from maxillary sinus augmentation procedure and bone graft


Figure 4 The CT axial scan shows vestibular bone loss (arrow) (Case 1)


Figure 5 Intraoral aspect of the fistula (Case 1)


Figure 6 The intraoperative view shows that the bone fistula is considerably larger than the mucosal one (Case 1)


Figure 7 Tearing of the periosteum at the tuber makes it possible to highlight the buccal fat pad (Case 1)


Figure 8 Initial protrusion of the BFP (arrow) (Case 1)


Figure 9 Protrusion of the BFP once the masseter and buccal extensions, holding it in place, are removed (Case 1)


Figure 10 Bichat flap suture at the palatal mucosal margin of the fistula with full coverage of the bone fistula (Case 1)


Figure 11 Suture of the vestibular mucosal flap leaning as a second layer on the BFP (Case 1)

The branches of the facial nerve for mid-face muscles lay adjacent to the BFP and the masseteric process. They vary in size between 0.5 mm and 1.5 mm, are opalescent white in color and have an elastic consistency. This means that they can be easily seen by spreading the tissues along their horizontal axis using the tips of scissors. It is crucial that these important nerve branches are kept intact and manipulated as little as possible in order to preserve their function and avoid facial paralysis or paresis.
Besides repairing oroantral fistulas, further applications are in maxillary bone grafts and tumour surgery (Figure 12-25).

Figure 12 Case 2: preoperative OPT showing that, before implant surgery, maxillary sinus augmentation and bilateral bone graft are required
Figure 13 Tearing of the left sinus membrane (arrow) during sinus lift procedure (Case 2)


Figure 14 Identification of the BFP (Case 2)


Figure 15 Grafting with hydroxyapatite particulate after BFP transposition in order to cover the perforation of the sinus membrane (Case 2)


Figure 16 The grafting procedure is achieved (Case 2)


Figure 17 Vestibular suture at the end of surgery (Case 2)


Figure 18 Postoperative OPT after 3 months showing that the graft is correctly set in place (Case 2)


Figure 19 Case 3: patient with low-grade carcinoma of the minor salivary glands (arrow). The margins of the surgical resection are highlighted


Figure 20 At the end of the resection of the neoformation, the surgical wound in the palatal bone can be seen (arrow) (Case 3)


Figure 21 The BFP is visible near the tuber (Case 3)


Figure 22 With the BFP the loss of substance does not create tension (Case 3)


Figure 23 The flap sutured in place (Case 3)


Figure 24 The flap 4 weeks after surgery, surface epitheliazation can be observed (Case 3)


Figure 25 Normalization of the palatal mucosa 4 months after surgery. The surface of the flap appears indistinguishable from the surrounding palatal mucosa (Case 3)


It is reported that the sinus membrane is perforated during sinus lift surgery in a percentage varying between 7% and 35%. If this occurs, the surgeon can stop the sinus lift procedure and wait a few months for the membrane to repair before repeating the operation. However, if the perforation only amounts to a few millimeters, it is often not necessary to repair it because the detaching and lifting of the Schneiderian membrane folds it in on itself and spontaneously closes the tear. If the perforation exceeds 5 mm it is advisable to correct it, in order to be able to simultaneously perform a particulate graft that can be guaranteed as much as possible to stay in place, ensure reasonably low infection rates and avoid sinusitis developing from the entry of a foreign body. The reparative surgical techniques available include direct suturing of the membrane (generally hard to do because of the very limited space), or using fibrin glue, resorbable membranes or cancellous bone laminas. Using the BFP, possibly also in combination with a graft of bone lamina, is the most appropriate approach for larger defects of over 10 mm. The transposition of the BFP body as a graft is certainly easily done, but it does not provide the same guarantee of quick recovery and protection from infections as are given by preparing it as described in this article as a pedicled flap which is therefore richly vascularised. The author therefore prefers the pedicled form which is more complicated to prepare but provids better defence against any infections.
The volume of the BFP varies depending on the patient’s nutritional condition and on individual variables. Nonetheless, for repairing a tear in the sinus membrane it is always sufficient, as it has always been (in personal experience) for repairing oroantral fistulas. But its size is generally insufficient for repairing defects resulting from removing a tumor of over 2.5 cm.
In the case of oroantral fistulas of just a few millimeters and with good surrounding bone borders, the tissues can spontaneously heal and close in a few days/weeks. Alternatively, especially in cases where the fistula persists, it can be closed by very carefully cutting the periosteum that holds the vestibular mucosa in order to allow it to slide; this is followed by careful sutures with “U” stitches between the palatal and vestibular mucosa. However, if the fistula is a natural discharge outlet from a purulent sinusitis process above, closing it can cause problems, even to the extent of triggering a sinus abscess and it is therefore advisable for the sinus to receive endoscopic treatment concurrently with closing the fistula.
In the case of large fistulas (over 7-8 mm) and particularly when there is a lack of bone support due to iatrogenic reasons or chronic infection, the BFP flap can easily block the loss of substance. To provide more mechanical sealing security, the closure can be reinforced using a second mucous lining to lay over the BFP adipose tissue. In this case, the BFP flap will have a twofold function of closing the fistula and being a vascular base supporting the mucous flap. However, this cannot be used for most tumor defects when a large quantity of mucous membrane has already been removed: the BFP flap in this circumstance acts as the only diaphragm between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus.
When the flap is transposed, the time for epithelialization of its surface is about 2-4 weeks: after this time, its aesthetic appearance is indistinguishable from the surrounding mucosa.
For mechanical resistance to acquire the high consistency of scars takes about 3-4 months.
Cutting the branches of the facial nerve adjacent to the body of the BFP leads to paralysis of some mimetic muscles which can partly be compensated by neighbouring branches. It is obvious that scrupulous attention must be paid when preparing the flap to avoid this serious complication.
Cutting the parotid duct seems much more unlikely since its position is more cranial than the BFP. In any case, the size of the duct is very large and it is therefore easily seen. If this complication ever occurs, it would be necessary to cannulate it with a small-calibre silicone tube to leave in place for several weeks. The incorrect preparing of the flap by excessively reducing its vascular supply can lead to atrophy, bacterial superinfection and its re-absorption. In this case it will be necessary to consider alternative surgical methods to resolve the problem later on: vestibular mucosa flaps, the buccinator myomucosal flap, the temporal muscle flap and others can be prepared.
Lastly, it is to be remembered that the BFP has also been “discovered” by cosmetic surgery where it can be partially removed to give better definition to the facial profile and make the cheeks leaner, while its transposition in the form of a flap can increase the volume and profile of the upper lip and zygomatic arches.


The BFP flap, richly vascularised and with a natural tendency to close spaces, is a valid and reliable option for repairing large sinus mucosa defects occurring during sinus lift operations, for oroantral fistulas and losses of posterior maxillary substance less than 2.5cm in diameter.


Thanks to Prof. Giovanni Felisati for his collaboration in the cases treated jointly using open and endoscopic surgical techniques.



  1. Abuabara A, Cortez LV, Passeri LA, et al. Evaluation of different treatments for oroantral/oronasal communications: experience of 112 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:155-8.
  2. Adams T, Taub D, Rosen M. Repair of oroantral communications by use of a combined surgical approach: functional endoscopic surgery and buccal advancement flap/buccal fat pad graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015 Aug;73(8):1452-6.
  3. Arce K. Buccal fat pad in maxillary reconstruction. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Mar;15(1):23-32.
  4. Baumann A, Ewers R. Application of the buccal fat pad in oral reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:389–92.
  5. Bichat X. In: Traité d’anatomie descriptive. Paris: Bresson-Gabon; 1801.
  6. Betts NJ, Miloro M. Modification of the sinus lift procedure for septa in the maxillary antrum. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Mar;52(3):332-3.
  7. Biglioli F. Facial reanimations: part I Recent paralyses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015 Dec;53(10):901-6.
  8. Biglioli F. Facial reanimations: part II Long-standing paralyses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015 Dec;53(10):907-12.
  9. Colella G, Tartaro G, Giudice A. The buccal fat pad in oral reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2004;57:326-9.
  10. Dubin B, Jackson IT, Halim A, et al. Anatomy of the buccal fat pad and its clinical significance. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:257-62.
  11. Egyedi P. Utilization of the buccal fat pad for closure of oro-antral and/or oro-nasal communication. J Maxillofac Surg 1977;5:241-4.
  12. Felisati G, Chiapasco M, Lozza P, et al. Sinonasal complications resulting from dental treatment: outcome-oriented proposal of classification and surgical protocol. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):e101-6.
  13. Hao SP. Reconstruction of oral defects with the pedicled buccal fat pad. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:863-7.
  14. Marzano UG. Lorenz Heister’s ‘‘molar gland’’. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115:1389-93.
  15. Hernández-Alfaro F, Torradeflot MM, Marti C. Prevalence and management of Schneiderian membrane perforations during sinus-lift procedures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008 Jan;19(1):91-8.
  16. Khiabani K, Keyhan SO, Varedi P, et al. Buccal fat pad lifting: an alternative open technique for malar augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014 Feb;72(2):403.e1-15.
  17. Khoury F. Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):557-64.
  18. Matarasso A. Buccal fat pad excision: aesthetic improvement of the midface. Ann Plast Surg 1991 May;26(5):413-8.
  19. Rubio-Bueno P, Ardanza B, Piñas L, Murillo N. Pedicled buccal fat pad flap for upper lip augmentation in orthognathic surgery patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013 Apr;71(4):e178-84.
  20. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004 Apr;75(4):511-6.
  21. Shlomi B1, Horowitz I, Kahn A, Dobriyan A, Chaushu G. The effect of sinus membrane perforation and repair with Lambone on the outcome of maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Jul-Aug;19(4):559-62.
  22. StajcicÅL Z. The buccal fat pad in the closure of oaro-antral communications: a study of 56 cases. J Craniomaxillofac Surg1992;20:193-7.
  23. Tharanon W, Stella JP, Epker BN. Applied surgical anatomy of the buccal fat pad. Oral and Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1990;2:377-86.
  24. Tideman H, Bosanquet A, Scott J. Use of the buccal fat pad as a pedicled graft. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:435-40.
  25. Van Den Bergh JP, Ten Bruggenkate CM, Disch FJ, Tuinzing DB. Anatomical aspects of sinus floor elevations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 Jun;11(3):256-65.
  26. Zhang HM, Yan YP, Qi KM, et al. Anatomical structures if the buccal fat pad and its clinical adaptations. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2509-18.